Which of the following illustrates the conflict of Initiative vs. Guilt?

Disable ads (and more) with a premium pass for a one time $4.99 payment

Study for the Florida DCF CGAD Exam. Study with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each question has hints and explanations. Get ready for your exam!

The option that best illustrates the conflict of Initiative vs. Guilt is the encouragement of children to be curious and explore. This stage, as defined by Erik Erikson, typically occurs during early childhood, roughly from ages 3 to 6. During this period, children begin to assert their power and control over their environment through directing play and other social interactions.

Encouraging curiosity and exploration supports the development of initiative. Children who are motivated to explore their surroundings feel a sense of freedom and empowerment, ultimately helping them to develop a strong sense of self and the confidence to take on new challenges. This initiative is crucial for nurturing a child's creativity and problem-solving skills.

In contrast, if children are discouraged from exploring or are made to feel guilty about their curiosity, it can hinder their development and lead to feelings of guilt when they want to take initiative. This can affect their willingness to engage in new activities or to express themselves fully.

The other options, such as establishing routines, developing trust, and avoiding risks in physical activities, do not specifically speak to the tension of wanting to take initiative and the potential guilt associated with that urge. While they all play roles in a child's development, they do not illustrate the direct conflict between initiative and guilt as clearly as